Title 99N5-探討供應商評選準則之品質成本觀點 A Study of the Quality Cost Items for Supplier Selection Criteria
Name 饒淑芳
Advisor 余銘忠 老師
畢業日期 2011/06
Attachment 99N5Adobe PDF
Reference Link
Abstract 本研究應用內容分析法，收集與品質成本有關的項目，並透過專家訪 談與問卷的方式，歸納出企業對供應商遴選中較具影響性的品質成本項 目，再透過分析層級程序法計算權重，將品質成本的四大類：預防成本、 鑑定成本、內部失敗成本、外部失敗成本及下一階層的21 項衡量屬性， 歸納出各項準則與評估屬性的重要度，以作為供應商評選時在品質成本項 目的參考依據，並作為未來要求供應商的改善重點。
Bibliography 一、中文部分
1. 王家賢(2008)。結合AHP與DEA探討企業內部稽核之成效。高雄應用
科技大學商務經營研究所碩士論文。
2. 成之約(1998)。淺談派遣勞動及其對勞資關係之影響，就業與訓練。6 ，
52－56。
3. 吳有龍、郭芳明、鍾沛原(2004)。以模糊層級分析法探討遴選供應商之
指標。義守大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
4. 吳明哲(2007)。供應鏈系統下供應商評選之研究。成功大學工學院工程
管理學系碩士論文。
5. 吳萬益、林清河(2002) 。行銷研究。台北：華泰。
6. 江顯鵬(2002)。建立在品質保證體系上之總品質成本模式--以電子業為
主體。中原大學工業工程學系碩士論文。
7. 李清潭、楊斯琦、冷澤森(2008)。企業非核心職務人力外包決策因素及
評估之探討。中華管理評論，2，1-24。
8. 高淑娟、詹莊龍(2007)。供應商遴選之多屬性決策。2007決策分析研討
會，台灣清華大學。
9. 邱裕方(2006)。從品質改善資本投資的角度審視品質改善活動。品質學
報， 2，211-220。
10.陳政啟(2003)。用總品質成本分析之供應商績效評估模式。中原大學
工業工程學系博士學位論文。
7
11. 湯玲郎、林正明(2002)。品質成本制度實施程度與TQM製造績效之相
關性研究。中華管理學報，3，57-73。
12. 賴世鐸(2002)。品質成本制度之規劃設計及檢討分析--國內光電業之個
案研究。中原大學會計學系碩士論文。
13. 畢威寧(2005)。結合AHP與TOPSIS法於供應商績效評估之研究。科學
與工程技術期刊，1，75-83。
14. 徐燕娟(2008)。以AHP法探討供應商遴選關鍵決定因素權重之研究。
國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
15. 楊政學(2005)。企業研究方法。台北：普林斯頓國際有限公司。
16. 黃俊英(1994)。企業研究方法。台北：東華書局。
17. 鍾一平(2002)。供應商評估與遴選機制之分析與建立。逢甲大學工業
工程研究所碩士論文。
18. 簡禎富(2005)。決策分析與管理。台北：雙葉書廊。
8
二.英文部分
1. Choy, K. L., Lee, W. B. and Lo, V. (2002). An Intelligent Supplier
Management Tool for Benchmarking Suppliers in Outsource Manufacturing.
Expert System with Application, Vol. 22, No.3, pp. 213-224.
2. Crosby, P. (1979). Quality is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain, New
York: McGraw-Hill.
3. Dickson, Gray W. (1966), An Analysis of Supplier Selection System and
Decisions, Journal of Purchasing, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 5-17.
4. Delahaye, B.L. (2000), Human Resource Development: Principles and
Practice, Brisbane: John Wiley and Sons.
5. Deming, W. E. (1982). Quality, Productivity, and Competitive Position,
Cambridge: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering,
6. Duane Davis and Robert Cosenza. (1993), Business Research for Decision
Making, 3rd ed. Boston: Kent Publishing.
7. Feigenbaum, A.V. (1961), Total Quality Control, New York, McGraw-Hill.
8. Fish, Lynn A. and Shambu, G.S. (2001, November). Cost of Quality in
Supply Chain Management, 32nd Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences
Institute, San Francisco, CA.
9. Haq. A.N. and Kannan. G. (2006). Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process for
Evaluating and Selecting a Vendor in a Supply Chain model. International
Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 29, No.7/8, pp.
826-835.
10. Hemaida, R. and Schmits, J.(2006).An Analytical Approach to vendor
9
Selection. Industrial Management, Vol.48, No.3, pp. 18-24.
11. Houshyar, A. and David, L. (1992), A Systematic Selection Procedure,
Computer and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 23, No. 1-4, pp. 173-176.
12. Juran, J.M. (1951), Quality Control Handbook. McGraw-Hill.
13. Lee, E. K., Ha, S., and Kim, S. K. (2001). Supplier Selection and
Management System Considering Relationships in Supply Chain
Management. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 48,
No. 3, pp. 307-318.
14. Morse, W. Roth, H. and Poston, K. (1987). Measuring, Planning, and
Controlling Quality Costs, National Association of Accountants.
15. Muralidharan, C., Anantharaman, N., and Deshmukh, S. G. (2001).
Vendor Rating in Purchasing Scenario: A Confidence Interval Approach.
International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol.21,
No.10, pp. 1305-1325.
16. Noci, G. (1997). Designing Green Vendor Rating Systems for the
Assessment of a Supplier's Environmental Performance. European Journal
of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 103-114.
17. Ramanathan, R. (2007). Supplier Selection Problem: Integrating DEA with
the Approaches of Total Cost of Ownership and AHP. Supply Chain
Management, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 258-261.
18. Roper-Lowe, G.C and Sharp, J.A. (1990).The Analytic Hierarchy Process
and Its Application to an Information Technology Decision. The Journal
of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 49-59.
10
19. Saaty, T.L. and Vargas, L.G. (1984), The Legitimacy of Rank Reversal,
OMEGA, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 513-516.
20. Saaty, T.L. (1986), Axiomatic Foundation of Analytic Hierarchy Process,
Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 7, pp. 841-855.
21. Tagaras, G. and H.L. Lee.(1996), Economic Models for Vendor Selection
With Quality Cost Analysis, Management Science, Vol. 42, No. 11, pp.
1531-1543.
22. Thomas, D.J. and Griffin, P.M. (1996), Coordinated Supply Chain
Management, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 94, No. 1,
pp. 1-15.
23. Weber, C.A. Current, J.R. Benton, W.C. (1991), Vendor Selection Criteria
and Methods, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 50, No. 1,
pp. 2-18.
24. Wilson, E. J. (1994), The Relative Importance of Suppliers Selection
Criteria: A Review and Update, International Journal of Purchasing and
Materials Management, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 35-41.
25. Yahya, S. and Kingsman, B. (1999), Vendor Rating for an Entrepreneur
Development Programme: A Case Study Using the Analytic Hierarchy
Process Method. Journal of Operational Research Society, Vol. 50, No. 9,
pp. 916-930.